9/12/2023 0 Comments Andrew yang twitter area 51![]() Personality and pre-existing stores of social capital 6 may moderate the impact of social media platforms on psychological well-being. A similar phenomenon has often been reported in the political engagement literature, where the technology may reinforce the offline gaps between those with better and poorer resources 8. The reinforcement hypothesis suggests that online communication can reinforce the quality of existing friendships and enhance well-being 58. Although the possible link between social media use and well-being remains a public health concern, the empirical evidence remains inconclusive and suggestive of a marginal or a null effect 14, 34, 41, 42, 49. Subjective well-being is a measure of how people evaluate their lives 17. Potential ecological fallacies have been addressed with appropriate controls, cross-lagged predictions, and clustered random effects in all analyses. Together, they enable an understanding of the population-level differences in the well-being effects of social media in the United States. The primary findings are triangulated with the secondary dataset, comprising geocoded web search data collected from the Google Trends API, and the tertiary dataset, comprising individual-level survey-based findings over 5 years. The primary dataset constitutes region-level consumer trends of social media use collated by the Simmons National Consumer Survey. The questions are addressed through the multi-level modeling of regional- and individual-level data from representative surveys by the Simmons National Consumer Survey, Gallup-Sharecare Well-Being Index, and Pew Research, together with Google Trends web traffic data. The following additional research questions are posed:ĭo the well-being effects of social media use generalize to analyses with digital trace data?ĭo the inter-group differences in the well-being effects generalize to analyses with individual-level data?ĭo the well-being effects of social media use generalize to other mental health outcomes? What are the inter-group differences of these effects?Īdditionally, this study is interested in exploring whether these findings generalize in analyses of other datasets comprising systematic variations in data sampling, the measurement of social media use, and even the mode of data collection. ![]() What are the platform-specific differences in the associations of social media use and well-being? This study confronts the limitations in prior work and addresses the following research questions: Therefore, the primary findings relate to the platform-specific and inter-group differences in the well-being effects of social media use at the regional level. However, the heterogeneity in the results can often be based only on a region-level analysis, which survey data may not always support. This study begins with analyzing general social media use with region-level and individual-level data. They have also highlighted the need to reconceptualize how social media behavior is understood and measured 5. A few exceptions 2, 5, 23, 25 have explored the role of age 25, gender 42, 57, and race 23. However, there is limited evidence that these findings generalize to adult, multi-ethnic populations with socioeconomic differences. Endogenous variables-such as socioeconomic class, age, race, and gender-associated with social media use and well-being could explain all reported associations. ![]() 49, Orben and Przybylski 41, Best, Manktelow, and Taylor 7). Most findings regarding these associations have relied on survey responses by adolescents and students in school and university settings (for a comprehensive literature review, please see Liu et al. The first reason is the limitations of survey methods in terms of representativeness and scale. This debate remains in flux for two main reasons.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |